October 2026

Energy storage systems Top 10

Scores are normalized within the category and are not directly comparable with the industry ranking. AlphaESS leads with 60.2, 4.8 points ahead of Elecod; this category's exposure is concentrated on YouTube.

Data through Oct 31Brands in category 20Next update Nov 30

Energy storage systems Top 10

Arrows vs. previous issue · all page data is public

1
AlphaESSEnergy storage systems60.2
Followers
11.2K
Follower growth rate
0.06%
Exposure
749
Engagement
2.67%
Posts
6
Viral share
0.00%
2
ElecodEnergy storage systems55.4
Followers
23
Follower growth rate
4.55%
Exposure
164
Engagement
1.22%
Posts
9
Viral share
33.33%
3
Trina StorageEnergy storage systems54.5
Followers
16.7K
Follower growth rate
-0.04%
Exposure
315
Engagement
3.49%
Posts
7
Viral share
14.29%
4
CESCEnergy storage systems51.3
Followers
648
Follower growth rate
0.47%
Exposure
141
Engagement
0.71%
Posts
1
Viral share
0.00%
5
HoenergyEnergy storage systems46.6
Followers
161
Follower growth rate
0.00%
Exposure
124
Engagement
1.61%
Posts
6
Viral share
33.33%
6
ZOE Energy StorageEnergy storage systems44.3
Followers
64
Follower growth rate
1.59%
Exposure
36
Engagement
0.00%
Posts
2
Viral share
0.00%
7
HyperStrongEnergy storage systems38.2
Followers
271
Follower growth rate
0.00%
Exposure
57
Engagement
0.00%
Posts
1
Viral share
0.00%
8
JD EnergyEnergy storage systems37.9
Followers
7
Follower growth rate
0.00%
Exposure
21
Engagement
14.29%
Posts
3
Viral share
0.00%
9
TeclomanEnergy storage systems36.4
Followers
345
Follower growth rate
0.00%
Exposure
14
Engagement
0.00%
Posts
1
Viral share
0.00%
10
SERMATECEnergy storage systems34.4
Followers
68
Follower growth rate
1.49%
Exposure
0
Engagement
0.00%
Posts
0
Viral share
0.00%

Energy storage systems Top 10
Rank	Brand	Score	Followers	Follower growth rate	Exposure	Engagement	Posts	Viral share
1	AlphaESSEnergy storage systems	60.2	11.2K	0.06%	749	2.67%	6	0.00%
2	ElecodEnergy storage systems	55.4	23	4.55%	164	1.22%	9	33.33%
3	Trina StorageEnergy storage systems	54.5	16.7K	-0.04%	315	3.49%	7	14.29%
4	CESCEnergy storage systems	51.3	648	0.47%	141	0.71%	1	0.00%
5	HoenergyEnergy storage systems	46.6	161	0.00%	124	1.61%	6	33.33%
6	ZOE Energy StorageEnergy storage systems	44.3	64	1.59%	36	0.00%	2	0.00%
7	HyperStrongEnergy storage systems	38.2	271	0.00%	57	0.00%	1	0.00%
8	JD EnergyEnergy storage systems	37.9	7	0.00%	21	14.29%	3	0.00%
9	TeclomanEnergy storage systems	36.4	345	0.00%	14	0.00%	1	0.00%
10	SERMATECEnergy storage systems	34.4	68	1.49%	0	0.00%	0	0.00%

Energy storage systems Charging equipment Solar materials Solar modules Home energy storage Smart energy Hydrogen equipment Inverters and controls Lithium battery cells Wind power equipment

Brand × platform heatmap

Darker cells mean more posts by this brand on that platform this period; a grey 0 means no posts

YouTube

TikTok

Instagram

Facebook

Threads

LowHigh

Exposure share within the category

AlphaESS carries 46.21% of exposure

Share of 31-day exposure across category brands

AlphaESS 46.21%Trina Storage 19.43%Elecod 10.12%CESC 8.70%Hoenergy 7.65%HyperStrong 3.52%ZOE Energy Storage 2.22%JD Energy 1.30%Tecloman 0.86%

Engagement rate by brand

Median engagement 0.00%; 6 brands above it

Interactions / exposure, 31 days

Full ranking data

Every New Energy and Energy Storage Brand Rankings brand this issue (beyond the Top 20), 19 metrics, weekly series and viral post lists, delivered as Excel.

Category rankings

How the score works

Audience strength

Audience size: 15%
Follower growth: 20%

Content reach

Content activity: 10%
Content distribution: 25%
Viral potential: 10%

Engagement strength

Engagement performance: 20%

The SocialEcho overseas social media influence score is calculated out of 100 using public data from a brand's main official overseas social media accounts over the past 30 days. Data for the same brand across platforms is aggregated and compared with similar 3C brands. Account coverage is limited to the brand's main global official account (Global/Official) on each included platform, with at most one main account per platform. Regional, country, product-line, dealer and other affiliated accounts are excluded. If a brand has no unified main global account, its main international official account is selected using the brand's website, public platform identifiers and other verifiable information. The score comprises six dimensions: audience size (15%) reflects the brand's existing audience base; follower growth (20%) combines the growth rate and net follower gains to measure audience expansion; content activity (10%) combines publishing volume and consistency to reflect content investment; content distribution (25%) combines total views and median views per post to reflect overall reach and consistent distribution; engagement performance (20%) uses like, comment and share rates to reflect audience approval, discussion and active sharing; viral potential (10%) uses the proportion of viral posts to reflect the brand's ability to consistently produce widely distributed content. Dimension scores are combined using these weights to produce the brand's final overseas social media influence score.

Methodology →

Loading rankings…

Energy storage systems Top 10

Energy storage systems Top 10

Brand × platform heatmap

Exposure share within the category

Engagement rate by brand